Durham LNAT, in numbers.
Durham reads holistically. The MCQ does meaningful work but isn't a cut-off, and the essay is read but not graded.
Durham reads holistically. The MCQ does meaningful work but isn't a cut-off, and the essay is read but not graded.
Three chapters. Every figure from a primary source.
Durham reads holistically. The MCQ does meaningful work but isn't a cut-off, and the essay is read but not graded.
Durham's LNAT page explicitly states "the multiple-choice part of the test is marked out of 42 and this, as well as your essay, are made available to the universities you apply to help in the selection process." So Durham reads BOTH the MCQ and essay (unlike LSE). Durham releases offer-holder LNAT averages but does not publish per-applicant data. The most recent four cycles for which figures are public: 2019/20, 2020/21, 2021/22, 2022/23 [Durham FOI 23-24].
| Cycle | Applicant MCQ avg | Offer-holder MCQ avg | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019/20 | — | 24.7 | 2,235 apps, 1,390 offers, 665 firm |
| 2020/21 | 23 | 24 | Range 7–36 (apps); 12–36 (offers) |
| 2021/22 | 21.8 | 24.0 (23.89 alternate) | Two FOI responses give slightly different averages for the same cycle |
| 2022/23 | 23.9 | 26.0 | Most recent disclosed cycle |
Three numbers worth fixing in your head:
26 — Durham's most recent offer-holder MCQ average (2022/23). The bar moved up from 24 in 2020/21 [Durham FOI 23-24].
12 — Durham's lowest disclosed offer LNAT. In 2020/21, the lowest offer-holder MCQ was 12/42. No offers below that have surfaced in released data [Durham FOI 2021 cycle].
~2-mark gap. Across all four cycles, Durham's offer-holder average sits 2-3 marks above the applicant-pool average. The discrimination is real but smaller than at Oxford or UCL.
Durham is the only LNAT-using university whose Law course carries the UCAS code M101 rather than M100. The code confuses applicants every cycle. The content is the same kind of three-year LLB you'd get at any M100 university; only the code differs.
Three practical implications:
If you're applying to Durham and any combination of Oxford/UCL/KCL/LSE/Bristol, expect to see both M100 and M101 across your UCAS choices. Both are the same kind of programme.
Durham's 2020/21 cycle is the most thoroughly disclosed: applications, offers, breakdowns by domicile and contextual status, GCSE/A-Level/IB averages for both applicants and offer holders, and the full LNAT min/avg/max [Durham FOI 2021 cycle].
2020/21 saw 1,025 total offers, broken down as:
Two patterns stand out:
Figure 1 · Visualisation 1 of 6
Across the four cycles for which Durham has released LNAT data, the offer-holder MCQ average has crept up: 24.7 (2019/20) → 24 (2020/21) → 24 (2021/22) → 26 (2022/23). The applicant pool average has tracked similarly: 23 → 21.8 → 23.9. The 2-mark gap between applicant and offer-holder pools is consistent.
Figure 2 · Visualisation 2 of 6
Durham's offer-holder MCQ averages typically sit 2-3 points above the applicant pool — a smaller gap than at Oxford (5+ points) or UCL (3-4 points). That matches Durham's stated holistic approach: the LNAT separates similar applications but doesn't dominate the decision the way it does where there's a hard MCQ floor.
The 2022/23 lift is a real 2-mark increase from the previous cycle. Three possible explanations:
The applicant-pool growth from 21.8 to 23.9 (2.1 marks) almost exactly mirrors the offer-holder lift (24 to 26 = 2.0). The bar probably didn't tighten — the field improved.
Durham's position on the LNAT essay is distinctive: it isn't scored on any scale, but selectors read it and use it to spot "strengths and weaknesses of a candidate." Middle ground between Oxford (formally graded) and KCL (ignored entirely) [Durham M101 admissions policy].
From Durham Law School's published guidance:
"A further reason [we don't track minimum scores] is that the LNAT also entails an essay component which is not marked or graded but can be incredibly useful in identifying strengths and weaknesses of a candidate. For example, a good LNAT essay demonstrates a good command of the English language, has a clear, persuasive argument and, ultimately, answers the question. You may find that strong performance in the LNAT multiple choice section may not necessarily result in a strong essay, or vice versa. Performance on the LNAT therefore can be of significant assistance in differentiating between two similar profiles."
Three criteria they cite:
A looser rubric than Oxford's "high-mark features" or UCL's three-quality framework. Durham doesn't reward independent critical judgment the way Oxford does; they want competent, on-topic, well-written argument.
Don't skip the essay for Durham. Even though it isn't graded, Durham selectors read it. A weak essay can hurt your application. Allocate enough prep time to produce a clear, well-written 500-word essay under timing pressure.
Durham releases applicant vs offer-holder GCSE, A-Level, and IB data for the 2020/21 cycle in unusual detail. The pattern: offer holders out-score applicants by about 0.7 A* GCSEs and 0.2 predicted A* A-Levels [Durham FOI 2021 cycle].
| Measure | Applicants | Offer holders | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avg A* GCSEs | 5.1 | 5.8 | +0.7 |
| Avg predicted A* A-Levels | 1.46 | 1.69 | +0.23 |
| Avg achieved A* A-Levels | 1.5 | 1.77 | +0.27 |
| Avg predicted IB total | 41.38 | 41.72 | +0.34 |
| Avg achieved IB total | 41.14 | 41.6 | +0.46 |
Durham's published M101 offer is typically A*AA at A-Level (with A* in an essay subject preferred but not required). The 2020/21 entrant average tariff was 180 UCAS points — equivalent to A*A*A or A*AA. Most entrants come in with predicted A*A*A or higher.
For IB applicants, the typical offer is 38-40 points overall with 666 at Higher Level. Predictions of 41+ are competitive; achieved scores of 41+ are at the offer-holder level.
Durham takes a high share of international students compared with most LNAT universities. The overseas offer rate has run at 55-70% across the published cycles [Durham FOI international 2015-2018].
| Cycle | Overseas apps | Overseas offers | Overseas offer rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 600 | 345 | 57.5% |
| 2016 | 775 | 450 | 58.1% |
| 2017 | 650 | 455 | 70.0% |
| 2018 | 800 | 440 | 55.0% |
Two structural factors drive the rate:
The high overseas offer rate doesn't mean Durham is "easy" for international applicants. It means they face less filtering at the offer stage than at UCL or Oxford. Durham applies the same MCQ standards but issues more offers per overseas application.
Durham's 2015-2018 international cohorts came from approximately 40 countries (FOI 469 lists nationalities by year). Top sources include China, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore, India, the United States, Canada, Germany, France, and Italy.
Durham has 16 residential colleges (plus a few international study halls). Unlike Oxford and Cambridge, Durham's colleges are NOT academic admitting bodies — Durham Law School admits centrally, and college allocation happens after offers are made. Colleges shape your residential and pastoral experience, not your academic placement [Durham FOI international colleges 2012/13].
At Oxford and Cambridge, you apply to a specific college, the college shortlists and interviews you, and the college decides whether to make you an offer. At Durham, the central admissions team decides offers; the college just gives you a residential cohort.
That said, the FOI data breaks down international applicants and entrants by college, so some loose preference-matching happens at allocation. The 2012-2013 international intake by college:
| College | 2012 international apps | 2012 entrants | 2013 international apps | 2013 entrants |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Collingwood | 19 | 16 | 13 | <5 |
| Grey | 21 | 6 | 8 | 5 |
| Hatfield | 14 | <5 | 14 | <5 |
| Josephine Butler | 36 | <5 | 16 | <5 |
| St Aidan's | 8 | 6 | 15 | <5 |
| St Chad's | 38 | 8 | 13 | <5 |
| St Cuthbert's Society | 29 | <5 | 19 | <5 |
| St Hild and St Bede | 58 | 7 | 12 | <5 |
| St John's | <5 | 0 | 6 | <5 |
| St Mary's | 18 | 6 | 21 | 7 |
| Trevelyan | 44 | 14 | 5 | <5 |
| University | 5 | <5 | 14 | <5 |
| Van Mildert | 26 | <5 | 14 | <5 |
For LNAT-prep purposes, your college choice doesn't change your LNAT bar at Durham. The LNAT is read centrally; your offer chances aren't influenced by which college you select. Choose based on:
None of these matter for whether your application succeeds.
Durham accepts applicants whose latest qualification is an Access to Higher Education Diploma (a non-traditional route for mature applicants). The numbers are small but Durham has released the LNAT, age, and GCSE distributions for these applicants [Durham FOI Access HE].
| Year | Access HE applicants | Access HE offers |
|---|---|---|
| 2018/19 | 20 | 0 |
| 2019/20 | 25 | 5 |
| 2020/21 | 25 | 5 |
| 2021/22 | 20 | 0 |
For Access HE Diploma applicants, Durham is one of the few LNAT universities with a real route. The LNAT still counts, but age, prior life experience, and motivation carry real weight.
Durham Law School's published admissions philosophy is unusually clear about the LNAT's role and the criteria selectors weight. Worth reading in full — Durham is more transparent than Oxford or UCL about how it decides [Durham M101 admissions policy].
The key quote: "A key differentiating factor used when considering very similar applications."
On minimum scores: "We do not insist on a minimum score for the LNAT. Rather, LNAT performance should be interpreted in light of the application overall."
On the essay: "The LNAT also entails an essay component which is not marked or graded but can be incredibly useful in identifying strengths and weaknesses of a candidate. For example, a good LNAT essay demonstrates a good command of the English language, has a clear, persuasive argument and, ultimately, answers the question."
Durham's published list of factors selectors use:
Durham's framing — "a key differentiating factor used when considering very similar applications" — is accurate. When two candidates have similar A-Level predictions, GCSEs, and personal statements, the LNAT separates them. When the profiles diverge, the LNAT is one signal among several.
That's why a 22 LNAT can win an offer at Durham (with strong everything else) and a 28 can lose one (with weak predictions or a generic statement). The LNAT does real work, but it doesn't dominate the decision.
Durham runs one of the broadest contextual offer programmes in the LNAT consortium. In the 2020/21 funnel, 295 of 460 UK offers (64%) were Generalised Contextual Offers — most UK offer holders qualified for some contextual reduction.
Eligibility for Durham contextual offers includes:
If you qualify for a contextual offer, Durham will reduce your A-Level offer (typically from A*AA to AAB) and weight your application contextually. The LNAT is read in light of school context.
Durham doesn't release per-applicant LNAT data, only aggregate min/avg/max. The calculator below uses the 2020/21 distribution (range 12-36 for offer holders, mean 24) to position your projected MCQ.
Recall that Durham's 2022/23 offer-holder average was 26 — slightly above the 2020/21 mean used for this calculator. Adjust your interpretation 1-2 marks upward if benchmarking against the most recent cycle.
Durham's holistic reading, broad contextual offer programme, and essay-but-not-graded policy push prep in a different direction from Oxford or UCL.
You're competing against ~2,000 other applicants for ~1,000 offers. The LNAT does real but not dominant work. Predictions of A*A*A and 6+ A* GCSEs are typical for the offer-holder pool.
Strategy: 50% MCQ drilling (target 28+), 25% essay practice (Durham reads it!), 25% personal statement and reference quality. The 14 January deadline is a real constraint — start prep by August.
The 2-mark gap between applicant pool (24) and offer holders (26) means moving from 22 to 25 is significant. Durham reads holistically, so a 22 LNAT with strong predictions and personal statement can win an offer.
Strategy: 60% MCQ drilling, 25% essay (it's read at Durham), 15% personal statement. Apply for a contextual offer if eligible — Durham's GCO programme is broad.
Durham's GCO programme accounted for 64% of UK offers in 2020/21. If you qualify (state school in low-progression area, free school meals, in care), apply contextually.
Strategy: Apply through Durham's GCO route. The reduced offer (typically AAB instead of A*AA) is a real drop. The LNAT bar runs slightly lower for contextual applicants. Engage with Durham's Supported Progression programme if eligible.
Durham's international offer rate has been 55-70% in recent years — higher than UCL or KCL. The bar isn't lower, but the offer pool is more permissive. The 2024 international LNAT mean was about 28-29.
Strategy: Same MCQ targets as home applicants (28+ for comfort). Durham accepts a wide range of international qualifications; check equivalencies early.
Durham accepts 0-5 Access HE Diploma applicants per year. The LNAT bar is genuinely lower (average 23.4). Durham is one of the few LNAT universities that takes Access HE seriously as a route.
Strategy: Apply through the standard M101 route but flag your Access HE Diploma in the personal statement. Engage with Durham's mature student admissions team.
Durham's deadline is 14 January — the same as Oxford's UCAS deadline but for the LNAT and UCAS form together. If you're applying to Durham + a 25 January university (UCL, KCL, LSE, Glasgow, SOAS), you must sit the LNAT by Durham's date. Plan prep backwards from 14 January, not 25 January.
All numbers on this page come from Durham FOI disclosures or Durham Law School's published admissions guidance. The 10 main FOI threads and the published M101 admissions policy are listed below.
Durham's FOI responses sometimes use the disclaimer "LNAT score is linked to the applicant's record using the UCAS Personal ID supplied by the applicant when completing the LNAT. Sometimes it is not possible to match to the admissions record for reporting if they have entered the incorrect personal ID." This means LNAT averages exclude applicants whose IDs didn't match. The figures are based on the matched subset.
Earlier FOI responses (2015-2017) said Durham did not hold an average LNAT score for offer holders. The 2019/20 cycle onwards, Durham has been able to provide this figure routinely. The shift suggests internal data systems were updated around 2019-2020 to track LNAT scores against admissions records.
The 2021/22 cycle has two slightly different averages disclosed (24.0 in one response, 23.89 in another). The discrepancy is likely from rounding and the matched-ID subset varying between requests. Either figure is approximately accurate.